🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," commented one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and others show that states internationally are less and less willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.